The quad Axel is figure skating's last great frontier. While quad toe loops and Salchows have become routine for the men's elite, and quad Lutzes and Flips are increasingly common, the Axel remains stubbornly resistant. Its forward takeoff, the extra half rotation, and the punishing entry edge make it a biomechanical puzzle unlike any other. For the experienced reader — coach, choreographer, or dedicated analyst — this guide unpacks the progression from first attempts to competitive viability, focusing on the trade-offs that define success and failure.
Why the Quad Axel Matters Now
The quad Axel has become the ultimate differentiator in men's figure skating. As the International Skating Union adjusts base values and Grade of Execution (GOE) multipliers, the reward for landing this jump grows, but so does the risk. A fall on a quad Axel attempt costs not just points but momentum and often the competition. Yet skaters who can land it — even inconsistently — gain a psychological edge over rivals who cannot attempt it at all.
At usagezxy.top, we see the quad Axel as a litmus test for training philosophy. Some teams prioritize it early, accepting years of instability. Others delay it, focusing on consistent quad Lutzes and Flips. Which approach yields better long-term results? The answer depends on the skater's anatomy, injury history, and competitive timeline. We are not talking about a jump that can be added in a single off-season; the quad Axel typically requires three to five years of dedicated progression from the triple Axel.
The Scoring Landscape
The current base value of a quad Axel is 12.50 points, but with maximum GOE it can reach nearly 19 points. Compare that to a quad Lutz (11.50 base) or quad Flip (11.00). The differential is significant, but only if the jump is landed cleanly. A downgraded or under-rotated quad Axel loses its advantage and may even score lower than a well-executed triple Axel. This risk-reward calculus shapes every coaching decision.
Many industry surveys suggest that fewer than ten male skaters have ever landed a fully rotated quad Axel in international competition. The list includes Ilia Malinin, who landed the first ratified one at 2022 Skate America, and a handful of others in training. For women, no one has yet landed one in competition, though several are attempting it in practice. This rarity underscores the difficulty.
Core Biomechanics of the Quad Axel
Unlike all other quad jumps, which take off backward, the Axel takes off forward. This means the skater must generate rotational force from a forward edge, then control the axis through four and a half rotations before landing backward. The forward takeoff introduces unique challenges: the skater must lean into the rotation while maintaining the correct edge, and the free leg must swing through a wider arc to generate torque.
The key biomechanical phases are the takeoff, the airborne rotation, and the landing. At takeoff, the skater's center of mass must be positioned slightly ahead of the skating foot, with the free leg driving upward and across the body. The arms must close quickly to increase rotational speed. In the air, the skater must maintain a tight spin position while resisting the tendency to tilt off-axis. The landing requires absorbing impact forces of up to eight times body weight while controlling the backward edge.
Forward Takeoff Mechanics
The forward outside edge used for the Axel is inherently less stable than the backward edge used for other quads. Any deviation in edge angle at takeoff leads to axis tilt in the air. Coaches often use harness work and off-ice training to ingrain the correct takeoff angle. Video analysis shows that successful quad Axel attempts have a takeoff edge angle between 45 and 50 degrees relative to the ice.
Rotational Speed and Air Position
To complete four and a half rotations, the skater must achieve a rotational velocity of approximately 5.5 revolutions per second during the airborne phase. This is about 15 percent faster than a triple Axel. Achieving this speed requires not just strength but precise timing of the arm closure and leg cross. Many skaters fail because they close too early, losing the ability to generate additional torque from the free leg swing.
Training Progression from Triple to Quad Axel
No skater goes directly from a triple Axel to a quad Axel. The progression typically involves a series of intermediate steps: off-ice training, harness work, single and double Axels with extra rotation, and finally the full quad Axel attempt. Each stage has specific technical benchmarks that must be met before moving forward.
Off-ice training focuses on rotational speed and landing mechanics. Skaters use trampolines and spinning devices to practice the four-and-a-half rotation motion without the risk of ice impact. Harness work on ice allows the coach to control the rotation and landing, reducing fear and injury risk. Once the skater can consistently land a triple Axel with a delayed rotation (i.e., adding an extra half rotation in the air), they are ready to attempt the quad Axel with a harness.
Benchmark 1: Delayed Triple Axel
The delayed triple Axel is a training tool where the skater tries to add a half rotation to their triple Axel, effectively attempting a 3.5 rotation jump. If the skater can land this consistently, it indicates sufficient rotational speed for the quad Axel. Many skaters plateau here because they cannot generate the extra speed without sacrificing axis control.
Benchmark 2: Harness Quad Axel
With a harness, the skater can attempt the full quad Axel rotation while the coach controls the landing. This stage often reveals issues with axis tilt or under-rotation. The goal is to achieve a fully rotated quad Axel in the harness before attempting it without support. This stage can take six months to two years.
Competitive Viability: When to Deploy the Quad Axel
Even after landing a quad Axel in training, the decision to include it in a competitive program is fraught. The jump must be integrated into a short program or free skate without disrupting the flow of other elements. Skaters must consider their overall layout: a fall on the quad Axel can lead to a cascade of errors in subsequent jumps.
Coaches often use a risk assessment matrix. Factors include the skater's success rate in practice (typically above 70 percent before competition consideration), the importance of the event, and the skater's mental readiness. For example, at a Grand Prix event, a skater might attempt the quad Axel in the free skate but not the short program, saving the higher-risk element for when they have more elements to compensate.
Case Scenario: The Conservative Approach
One team we follow chose to delay the quad Axel for two seasons after the skater first landed it in training. Instead, they focused on maximizing GOE on other quads and the triple Axel. The skater won a World medal without the quad Axel, then added it the following season with a 75 percent success rate. This approach prioritized consistency over headline-grabbing risk.
Case Scenario: The Aggressive Approach
Another skater attempted the quad Axel in every competition from the moment it was landed in practice, even with a success rate below 50 percent. The result was a mixed record: some brilliant performances with record scores, but also several disappointing finishes due to falls. Over three seasons, the skater's average score did not improve significantly compared to peers who used the quad Axel more selectively.
Edge Cases and Exceptions
Not every skater is built for the quad Axel. Body type, joint flexibility, and injury history play major roles. Skaters with shorter limbs may find it harder to generate the necessary rotational speed. Those with hip or ankle injuries may struggle with the landing impact. There is also a psychological component: fear of the forward takeoff can cause hesitation that ruins the jump.
Women's figure skating presents additional challenges. The quad Axel requires a level of power that is rare among female skaters. As of now, no woman has landed a fully rotated quad Axel in competition, though several have attempted it. The biomechanical demands are the same, but the lower average muscle mass means that rotational speed must be even more precisely optimized.
Judging Nuances
The quad Axel is subject to the same rotation and edge calls as other jumps, but the forward takeoff adds complexity for technical panels. A slight under-rotation (less than 90 degrees) may be called a quarter, reducing the base value to that of a triple Axel. Some skaters have argued that the forward takeoff makes it harder to achieve full rotation, but the rules do not provide any leniency.
Limits of Current Approaches
The current training methodology for the quad Axel is still evolving. There is no consensus on the optimal off-ice training regimen, and many coaches rely on trial and error. The lack of a large sample size — only a handful of skaters have landed it — means that best practices are based on limited data. Additionally, the risk of injury is high: hip and back injuries are common among quad Axel aspirants due to the repetitive high-impact landings.
Another limitation is the mental toll. The quad Axel is often described as the most frightening jump in skating. The forward takeoff and the longer time in the air create a sensation of falling that can be psychologically debilitating. Some skaters who can land it in practice never attempt it in competition because they cannot overcome the fear.
Finally, the competitive landscape may shift. If the ISU adjusts base values or GOE criteria, the quad Axel could become less valuable relative to other quads. Skaters and coaches must remain adaptable, not over-investing in a single element that could be de-emphasized in future rule changes.
For those pursuing the quad Axel, the path is clear but steep. Focus on biomechanical fundamentals, respect the progression timeline, and make strategic decisions about when to deploy it in competition. The skaters who succeed will be those who balance ambition with patience, and who understand that the quad Axel is not just a jump but a long-term project.
Comments (0)
Please sign in to post a comment.
Don't have an account? Create one
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!